REAL-TIME GLOBAL RESEARCH
Molson Coors Beverage Co: Beat 2Q26 EPS; Reiterated 2026 Outlook
Research evidence excerpt
J P M O R G A N
North America Equity Research
06 August 2026
Molson Coors Beverage Co
Beat 2Q26 EPS; Reiterated 2026 Outlook
Our Initial Take: A Bit Better Than Feared, But Brand Volumes Largely InLine; Leaning More on MG&A. TAP’s 2Q26 results were a bit better-thanexpected at the top-line as shipment phasing was likely less of a headwind than we
had anticipated, although brand volumes were largely in line with expectations and
there are some puts & takes to the reiterated 2026 outlook. First, perhaps
underlying consumption is coming in softer-than-anticipated with the company
now expecting a “slight” overshipment in 2H26 in the U.S. (added the “slight”
language vs. general “outpace” language) and no longer referencing expected
improvement in market share performance relative to 1Q26 in the U.S. Second,
TAP is now expecting MG&A to decline in 2H26 vs. prior expectation for MG&A
to increase. On the earnings call, we look for more color around underlying demand
trends and the consumer environment in the U.S. and decisions around spending.
Molson Coors Beverage (TAP, Neutral) reported 2Q26 adjusted EPS of
$1.58, which beat JPMe/consensus $1.50/$1/52 by +5.3%/+3.2%. Relative
to JPMe, upside to EPS was driven by better-than-expected top-line (+$0.02 vs.
JPMe) and lower-than-expected MG&A (+$0.12 vs. JPMe), which more than
offset slightly softer-than-expected gross margin (-$0.02 vs. JPMe) and belowthe-line items (-$0.04 vs. JPMe). Net sales decline of -3.3% was better vs.
JPMe/consensus -4.3%/-3.5% with Americas -4.1% (vs. JPMe/Consensus
Metrix -5.8%/-4.5%) and EMEA & APAC -0.4% (vs. JPMe/CM +0.8%/
+0.3%). Constant-currency net sales decline of -3.6% was better-than-feared
vs. JPMe/CM -4.8%/-4.1%. See additional detail in Table 3. Gross margins of
37.3% (-255 bps YOY) compared to JPMe/consensus 37.4%/37.0% with
underlying COGS/HL +6.3% ex-FX due to cost inflation, including a -$40M
headwind from Midwest premium, mix (premiumization unfavorable to
COGS/HL but beneficial to margin), and volume deleverage, partially offset
by cost savings. Operating expenses were 23.1% of sales (155 bps higher
YOY) vs. JPMe/consensus 24.0%/23.1% with company’s underlying MG&A
…
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer