ReportGem ReportGem 中文

REAL-TIME GLOBAL RESEARCH

Kinsale: 2Q26 Wrap: Modest EPS Reduction on Lower Premium Growth, Price Target and Rating Unchanged

Published: 2026-07-27Institution: JPMorganPages: 12Original language: EnglishEvidence page: 1

Research evidence excerpt

Kinsale: 2Q26 Wrap: Modest EPS Reduction on Lower Premium Growth, Price Target and Rating Unchanged

J P M O R G A N North America Equity Research

27 July 2026

Kinsale Neutral

KNSL, KNSL US

2Q26 Wrap: Modest EPS Reduction on Lower Premium Price (24 Jul 26):$349.10

Growth, Price Target and Rating Unchanged Price Target (Dec-27):$390.00

Reducing EPS estimates modestly, no change to December 2027 price target Insurance - Life & Nonlife

ACof $390 and Neutral rating. KNSL reported 2Q26 results on 7/23/26 and hosted Pablo S. Singzon

its conference call the next day. (1-212) 622-2295

pablo.s.singzon@jpmorgan.com

• EPS projections are decreasing as follows: 3Q26 from $5.48 to $5.33, 4Q26 Kevin Wijendra

from $6.16 to $6.05, and 2027 from $23.56 to $22.97. We are assuming (1) (1-212) 622-7054

slower gross premium growth and (2) lower net investment income, partly kevin.wijendra@jpmorgan.com

offset by (3) higher buybacks ($70 million per quarter, up from $55 million). J.P. Morgan Securities LLC

• 2Q26 summary: Net written premiums weaker than assumed; margins

and share repurchases better than expected. 2Q26 operating EPS was Quarterly Forecasts (FYE Dec)

$5.54, higher than our $5.18 estimate and consensus of $5.08. Adjusting for the Adj. EPS ($)

unfavorable variance in catastrophe losses and the favorable variance in 2025A 2026E 2027E

reserve releases, we estimate KNSL’s EPS would have been $5.51, still better Q1 3.71 5.11A

Q2 4.78 5.54A

than assumed. Compared to our model, the upside in earnings was driven by Q3 5.21 5.33

higher net earned premiums, a lower combined ratio, and a lower share count Q4 5.81 6.05

from higher share buybacks ($100 million vs. $55 million estimate), partly FY 19.51 21.95 22.97

offset by slightly lower investment income. Underwriting income was better

The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.

Open report viewer