GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
PJM CIFP—RBP In, C&M Out, Deal Cycle Intact
Research evidence excerpt
PJM CIFP—RBP In, C&M Out, Deal Cycle Intact
Equity Research
Flash Comment — June 30, 2026
Utilities and Power
Our Call Shahriar (Shar) Pourreza, CFA
We are not panicking for IPPs. RBP clears largely intact under Joint EDC/DCC framework, Equity Analyst | Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Shahriar.Pourreza@wellsfargo.com | 212-214-5422
tightening cost causation without disrupting bilateral deal flow. C&M falls away for now,
Constantine Lednevbut core mechanics driving July/August deals remain intact.
Equity Analyst | Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Constantine.Lednev@wellsfargo.com | 212-214-5438
Initial Thoughts Alexander Calvert
Associate Equity Analyst | Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Early reports indicate no C&M proposal passed, following state pushback on PJM’s latest Alexander.J.Calvert@wellsfargo.com | 212-214-5434
version, which shifted responsibility to states to avoid jurisdiction and curtailment issues. Whitney Mutalemwa
While lack of clear guidance on C&M could be an optical risk, we see deference to states as Associate Equity Analyst | Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
path of least resistance and potential clearer and less controversial path for RBP proposal Whitney.Mutalemwa@wellsfargo.com | 212-214-6428
that does move forward. Anders Myhre
Anders.S.Myhre@wellsfargo.com | 212-214-6409
The Joint EDC/Data Center Coalition package (including DUK, EXC, PPL, among others)
Andrew Kadavyappears to have carried the vote, with adjustments to procurement target-setting
methodology, cost allocation, and price caps, but no meaningful change to the core AssociateAndrew.Kadavy@wellsfargo.comEquity Analyst | Wells Fargo| 212-214-5485Securities, LLC
bilateral-first + backstop framework. This is a key win for EDCs who have been vocal about
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer