GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
Working the Lats: EPC Contract Structures Matter
Research evidence excerpt
Working the Lats: EPC Contract Structures Matter
Energy | Power & Utilities
June 23, 2026
Nicholas Amicucci, CFA Working the Lats: EPC Contract Structures
212-812-2931
nicholas.amicucci@evercoreisi.com Matter
Sharon Wang Shares of publicly traded EPC companies are selling off today as the
212-653-8999 market digests Primoris’ (not covered) business update and 8-K, in
Sharon.Wang@evercoreisi.com which the company announced the departure of its COO and further
lowered its FY26 guidance (the company had also lowered its FY26
guidance with its 1Q26 results). The lowering of Primoris’ FY26 revenue
and margin guidance represents the second time the company has cut
guidance over the last three months, citing lower expected revenue and
profitability within its Renewables business due to 6 projects
(unchanged from prior guidance reduction). While the cost overruns
experienced at the 6 projects have an impact on PRIM, based on the
information disclosed to date, we do not view PRIM’s project-
specific issues as sufficient evidence of a broad solar+storage
EPC industry problem. That said, PRIM’s update underscores
execution risk across fixed-price EPC work, and we would use any
pullback in PWR/MWH selectively, focusing on company-specific
backlog quality, contracting structure, and margin-risk controls.
As we outline on page 2, MWH and PWR both provide their
respective customers with a full lifecycle offering which we
believe mitigates some of the risk associated with a more project-
based EPC business and provides more predictable revenue
visibility. Importantly, we believe instances such as this one further
highlight the value provided by PWR’s unit-based project approach and
MWH’s Limited Notice to Proceed (LNTP) strategy, something we
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer