实时全球研报
Tariff Refunds: What We‘ve Learned and What Comes Next
研报英文原文证据摘录
Tariff Refunds: What We‘ve Learned and What Comes Next
. Management specifically stated it
Getinge ~$36M received Reduction of COGS used the same accounting principle as the original tariff expense and did not classify the
benefit as an item affecting comparability (IAC).
LG Electronics Yes (amount undisclosed) One-time operating gain Managementprofitcharacterizedbut did notthediscloserefund theas aaccountingnon-recurringline gainitem contributingor amount. to operating
PepsiCo Yes (qualitative) Not separately disclosed Management indicatedrecognitionrefundstimingwouldor financialoffset tariffstatementcosts andclassification.inflation but did not disclose
Source: Company Data, Morgan Stanley Research
How did stocks respond to these disclosures? Were they positive catalysts or is
the market looking beyond them? The market reaction to tariff refunds does not
appear material nor broad-based. Across the companies that have disclosed tariff
refunds alongside earnings over the past three months, the market didn't appear to
put much, if any, incremental valuation premium on the tariff refunds given relative
performance post-earnings were relatively muted at +1-2%. Importantly, because
these disclosures were made alongside earnings releases, the observed stock
reactions reflect the market's assessment of the overall earnings report rather than
tariff refunds in isolation, making it difficult to attribute the full stock move to the
refund announcement itself. The strongest relative outperformance came from
Graco (+6.4%), while LG Electronics (+2.0%), Keysight (+1.7%) and McCormick
(+1.6%) also saw gains. By contrast, Getinge (+0.4%) and PepsiCo (-0.8%) saw little
incremental benefit, as investors largely looked through the one-time earnings
impact ( Exhibit 2 ).
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器