实时全球研报
US Waste: A primer on the Recycling segment
研报英文原文证据摘录
US Waste: A primer on the Recycling segment
25 June 2026
US Business Services
This note is part of a series expanding on the economics of the Waste Industry, following Connor Cerniglia, CFA
+1 917 344 8472 previous primers covering the Solid Waste Collection and Landfill segments.
connor.cerniglia@bernsteinsg.com
The US recycling rate climbed from just ~5% in 1960 to ~25% in 2017, before
Bridget Alkin plateauing over the last decade, suggesting recent recycling volumes have grown in line
+1 917 344 8359 with the ~1% total waste growth. For comparison, the US recycling and composting rate is bridget.alkin@bernsteinsg.com
35%, below the 43-49% EU average, but is broadly in line with France and Ireland at ~41%.
After decades of improving recycling rates, we expect continued gains will be more difficult
to achieve, with Recycling volume growth modestly above total US waste growth.
Recycling economics are lower-margin and highly variable versus other waste
verticals. Revenue is split roughly 1/3rd tipping fees and 2/3rds recycled commodity
sales, making margins highly sensitive to commodity price changes. EBITDA margins
are the lowest within the waste value chain, often 15-20%, and account for 8% of
industry sales and 4% of EBITDA. While barriers to entry exist—driven by permitting and
high capital intensity—and are second only to landfills, the profitability gap between the
segments is wide. Volume throughput is about 1/10th that of a landfill, per-ton sorting and
handling costs are higher, and pricing is set by commodity prices rather than the capacity
scarcity and CPI+ escalators that benefit landfill economics.
For the largest three Waste companies, a 10% change in the recycled commodities
basket drives a 25-75bps impact to total company EBITDA. Old Corrugated Cardboard
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器