普通外文研报
Bytes: More On AI Costs; GOOGL's Role In DC Projects For AI Labs
研报英文原文证据摘录
Bytes: More On AI Costs; GOOGL's Role In DC Projects For AI Labs
June 20, 2026
AI Costs Still Small, Other Cost Saving Efforts Provide Offsets Until ROIs Become Evident
Last week, we highlighted the growing tension between the exponential paradigm in AI advancements and
the linear nature of enterprise diffusion of AI. In this report, we calculate AI costs for select companies in our
coverage based on press sources and other anecdotal datapoints.
In order to gauge current spend levels on internal AI tools, we gathered several data points from the past few
months on token usage, spending caps, and expectations for total AI spending on tools like Claude Code,
Codex, Cowork, etc. While these costs are expected to continue to grow on an exponential curve, we estimate
that internal AI-related expenses currently only account for <1% of revenue and 1-2% of opex across sampled
companies where data is available.
Exhibit 1: Internal AI Costs (% Revenue) Exhibit 2: Internal AI Costs (% Opex)
Note: See methodologies below; Opex represents – 1Q26 total costs and expenses for META adjusted to monthly; CY26E street opex
for CRM as of 6/18/2026; Opex ex-social charges for SPOT; 2Q26E Non-GAAP operating expenses for UBER adjusted for monthly
(S&M, O&S, R&D, G&A)
Source: Cantor Fitzgerald Estimates, Company Disclosures, Press Sources
While specific disclosure on AI spending is currently scarce, we highlight the various methodologies we use to
calculate current AI spending trends below.
META: Reports from April (here) indicate that META employees consumed 74T tokens over a 30-day
period ending in the beginning of April. Assuming a 70-20-10 mix for Opus-Sonnet-Haiku and typical
coding input/output token mix with enterprise discounts, we estimate META likely spent ~$250-300m
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器