普通外文研报
What's Really Driving (Un)affordability
研报英文原文证据摘录
What's Really Driving (Un)affordability
Australia | Insurance EquityJuneResearch17, 2026
KEY STOCKS FEATURED INCLUDE:What's Really Driving (Un)affordability
The intersection of claims inflation, natural perils and especially taxes, is TICKER RATING PRICE TARGET
materially adding to the cost burden of home insurance, resulting in the IAG AU BUY AUD8.75
domestic insurers being accused of gauging, while the consumer is caught QBE AU BUY AUD26.25
in the middle. With 1.6m households facing affordability stress, we examine SUN AU HOLD AUD18.40
issues regarding the affordability of domestic home insurance and the
implications for future premium growth.
Affordability Stress: Approximately 1.6m Australian households (15%) now face home
insurance affordability stress, up 50% in just two years. These households spend 9.6 weeks
of gross income on home insurance, seven times the non-stressed average. APRA warns that
1 in 4 homes could be uninsured within 25 years if current trends persist - an additional one
million homes lost to the protection gap.
Those who can least afford it are the ones who need it most. More than 70% of households at
highest flood risk earn less than $92,000 per year. ~35% are below the poverty line. Flood risk
and socioeconomic disadvantage are geographically co-located across Australia's east coast.
What about the impact of taxes? Government taxation is the second-largest component
of Australian home insurance premiums after natural peril risk, with state and territory
governments collecting approximately $8.90 billion in insurance taxes during FY24-25. In total
this represented $1.6bn more than the entire domestic insurance industry's NPAT in that year.
Who is really "charging like a bull": NSW remains the only mainland state with a premium-
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器