普通外文研报
Stocktake Australian Consumer Primer for 15 May 2026 – Coles/ACCC, CommBank household spending, Barbeques Galore
研报英文原文证据摘录
Stocktake Australian Consumer Primer for 15 May 2026 – Coles/ACCC, CommBank household spending, Barbeques Galore
J P M O R G A N Asia Pacific Equity Research
15 May 2026
Stocktake
Australian Consumer Primer for 15 May 2026 – Coles/
ACCC, CommBank household spending, Barbeques
Galore
ACKey themes we are exploring today: AustralianBryan RaymondConsumer Sector
(61-2) 9003-6750
• ACCC successful in price establishment case against Coles. The Federal bryan.raymond@jpmorgan.com
Court ruled that Coles made false or misleading representations about ‘Down Christina Kim
(61-2) 9003-7082
Down’ discounts in 13 of 14 sample products in the case (the one exception was christina.kim@jpmorgan.com
where no “was price” were used to demonstrate the savings). We have been J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited
critical of the supermarkets' behaviour during the last inflation cycle (the
reference period for this case); however, Coles has effectively been found
guilty of retrospectively breaking a rule which did not exist at the time. The
Federal Court believes a 12 week price establishment period is appropriate for
the sample products, which we consider very long by global standards
(typically 4 - 6 weeks). The ACCC and Coles statements were brief and the
Federal Court is yet to determine penalties. We expect Coles to appeal the
decision, but may decide to put this behind them. We were not surprised the
ACCC were successful in the case itself, with the focus shifting to the
magnitude of penalties. Theoretically, this could be $50m per offence or
$650m, or in a highly unlikely, worst case scenario, 10% of annual turnover
(~$4bn) for breaching consumer laws. Qantas’ $100m Federal Court penalty
over “ghost flights” in October 2024, in addition to ~$20m remediation
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器