ReportGem ReportGem 中文

REAL-TIME GLOBAL RESEARCH

Pelagos Insurance Capital: 2Q26 Wrap: Reducing EPS Estimates Modestly on Slower Premium Growth

Published: 2026-08-17Institution: JPMorganPages: 11Original language: English

Research evidence excerpt

J P M O R G A N

North America Equity Research

17 August 2026

Pelagos Insurance Capital

2Q26 Wrap: Reducing EPS Estimates Modestly on

Slower Premium Growth

Underweight

PLGO, PLGO US

Price (14 Aug 26):$23.84

▼Price Target (Dec-27):$25.00

Prior (Dec-27):$26.00

Adjusting EPS estimates and reducing December 2027 price target from $26

to $25; no change to Underweight rating. PLGO reported 2Q26 earnings on

8/12/26 and held its earnings call the following day.

We are adjusting EPS estimates as follows: 3Q26 from $0.86 to $0.82, 4Q26

from $1.01 to $1.12, and 2027 from $4.33 to $4.28. Our updated model reflects

(1) lower net earned premiums and investment income, mostly offset by (2) a

slightly better combined ratio. Management had guided to 3Q26 insurance net

earned premiums being “similar” to the second quarter (we are assuming $533

million in 3Q26 compared to $515 million in 2Q26), and 3Q26 reinsurance net

earned premiums to range from $130-160 million (we are assuming $159

million). PLGO is also guiding to a mid-40s loss ratio in both insurance and

reinsurance over time (with differing distributions between attritional and

catastrophe/large loss), but we are assuming loss ratios closer to the low-40s.

We note that a mid-40s loss ratio would imply overall combined ratios

closer to the mid-90s, which is worse than PLGO’s mid- to high-80s CR target.

2Q26 summary: margins pressured by large losses, premium growth

weaker than expected. Operating EPS of $0.34 was well below our and

consensus estimate of $0.88. Reserve releases (+$0.02 per share after taxes)

were more favorable than expected, adjusting for which, we estimate PLGO

would have earned $0.32. Alternative investment income was also favorable,

but PLGO does not include this item in operating income. Turning to

underwriting, results were weaker, driven by lower earned premiums (-$0.20)

and higher catastrophe/large losses (-$0.70), partly offset by lower expenses

(+$0.28) and attritional losses (+$0.07). Unlike other insurance carriers, where

we normalize for both prior-year development and catastrophe losses, for

PLGO we adjust only for PYD variances, as we consider potential exposure to

The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.

Open report viewer