REAL-TIME GLOBAL RESEARCH
2Q26 – Weak consumer & competition drive SSS of -4.5%, efficiencies mitigate
Research evidence excerpt
Accessible version
Soriana
2Q26 – Weak consumer & competition
drive SSS of -4.5%, efficiencies mitigate
Reiterate Rating: UNDERPERFORM | PO: 24.00 MXN | Price: 29.59 MXN
SSS -4.5%, EBITDA -7.3% ex other income, EPS +47.0%
31 July 2026
Despite weak operating results, EPS of Ps0.60 beat a Ps0.52 consensus on lower
financial expense and one-time tax benefit. Same stores fell 4.5%, on weaker consumer
demand and challenging competitive dynamics, and lagged ANTAD’s -0.1%. Total
revenue fell a greater 4.9% on 8 store closures over the LTM. Gross margin expanded
52bp on lower shrinkage, private label growth, real estate income and growth of
financial services. Efficiency efforts mitigated wage pressure and lost operating
leverage, but SG&A rose 69bp of sales, and EBITDA ex other income slipped 7.3% y/y
(margin -17bp). Reported EBITDA fell 4.3%. Lower D&A and funding costs, and a 17.8ppt
decline in effective tax rate, in part non-recurring, drove EPS growth of 47.0%.
Equity
Competitors accelerating expansion & price investment
Competitive challenges continue to intensify. Small box rivals are expected to add more
than 1,000 convenience food retail concepts in 2026 and further accelerate. FEMSA also
appears to be shifting Bara discount store openings from the Bajio to the Northeast,
adding a new dimension of challenge for Soriana. Simultaneously, FEMSA is expected to
further build out and improve value propositions in its OXXO grocery assortment, while
Walmex extends Everyday Low Pricing and Tiendas 3B accelerates expansion. These
more aggressively priced concepts are expected to further strengthen a trend toward
smaller tickets, rising frequency, downtrading and private label that is often expressed in
downturns among lower income consumers.
Macro & competitive challenges; real estate support
Soriana has moved to sharpen pricing, leverage technology to cut expenses, close
underperforming stores and reconfigure hypermarkets. Sluggish demand, rising labor
costs, and difficult competitive dynamics, however, drive our EPS cuts and underpin our
Underperform rating. Increasingly, we look for real estate holdings and book value to
…
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer