REAL-TIME GLOBAL RESEARCH
1Q report card: Eternal vs Swiggy: Analyzing KPIs & business drivers
Research evidence excerpt
Accessible version
Internet - India
1Q report card: Eternal vs Swiggy:
Analyzing KPIs & business drivers
Industry Overview
Blinkit extends its lead; Swiggy focuses on scaling
1Q27 highlighted Blinkit's continued outperformance in quick commerce, while food
delivery saw diverging trends amid LPG-led disruptions. In QC, Blinkit delivered NOV
growth of 86% YoY/19% QoQ versus Instamart's 40% YoY/3% QoQ. Swiggy’s QC
growth was slow as mgmt took conscious call to focus on CM breakeven (at the expense
of growth). Blinkit added 200 dark stores QoQ vs 28 for Instamart. Eternal’s mgmt now
sees higher visibility on steady state QC EBITDA margins at 6% (upper end of 5-6%
guide) and see competitive intensity as predictable and increasingly discount led.
Meanwhile Swiggy’s mgmt rather than providing a definitive timeline for adj. EBITDA
breakeven, linked breakeven to achieving materially higher scale, requiring roughly 2.6x
growth in NOV/c.2.2-2.6x growth in orders. Both Eternal & Swiggy saw EPS consensus
cuts post 1Q. Maintain Buy on Eternal (one of our top internet picks) & Neutral on
Swiggy given balanced risk-reward.
QC: Blinkit's scale compounds; Instamart pursues growth
Blinkit's growth continues to be driven by a combination of network expansion, higher
MTU additions & stronger order growth. Blinkit’s MTUs/orders grew 17%/21% QoQ
respectively and were materially ahead of Instamart’s 2% QoQ MTU & 2% order growth.
Blinkit's scale advantage continued to translate into better operating efficiency, with
dark-store throughput at 1,489 orders per day versus 1,089 for Instamart. Blinkit
reported 5.3% CM/0.6% EBITDA margin (on NOV), while Instamart had -0.3% CM/-13%
EBITDA margin. Swiggy achieved CM break-even in May'26 but chose to reinvest in
improving availability and delivery speed, resulting in overall quarterly losses.
FD: Zomato strengthens lead; Swiggy sees softer quarter
Zomato’s Adj. Revenue grew 33% yoy faster than Swiggy’s 19%. FD segment saw a
modest impact in 1Q due to LPG-led disruptions, with the effect more pronounced for
Swiggy. This resulted in a 130bps QoQ decline in adjusted Revenue market share for
Swiggy.…
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer