FISV, FIS, & GPN Reverse DCF Likely Too Punitive; Building Conviction Matters

Research evidence excerpt

FISV, FIS, & GPN Reverse DCF Likely Too Punitive; Building Conviction Matters

IdeaMreset for the broader payments sector, particularly given PayPal’s structurally

impaired slower growth profile and significant competitive challenges. FIS, GPN and

Fiserv arguably possess better ~LSD-MSD medium-term growth algorithms, with

potential to drive durable double-digit EPS growth, supported by largely recurring

processing revenues, but trade at 5-6x 2027E P/E (see Exhibit 4 ). The potential

transaction could shift investors' valuation framework away from near-term

execution concerns and toward the value of global distribution, scaled payments

infrastructure, embedded customer relationships, data and potential cost and

revenue synergies.

Exhibit 1: FISV: Our scenario reverse DCF suggests flat revenue growth

perpetually, consistent ~40 bp annual margin contraction, and gradual

degradation in unlevered FCF generation after 2028E. This would suggest

competition and tech debt results in gradual share donation as FISV grows below

inflation, while growing investment and capex needs are defensive, with limited

value attributed to scaled payments and core processing infrastructure.

Source: Morgan Stanley Research estimates; Note: Our key FCFF assumptions for Fiserv include consistent tax rate, gradually

increasing Capex as a % of revenue, and ~1% recurring cash adjustments.

Exhibit 2: GPN: Our scenario reverse DCF suggests ~1% revenue growth

through 2037E (below inflation) with flat terminal growth, consistent ~40 bp

annual margin contraction, and gradual degradation in unlevered FCF generation

after 2028E as defensive capex and investment needs grow, with limited value

attributed to nominal PCE exposure, Worldpay synergies, or buyback optionality.