GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
Philippine Power & Water Utilities Regulatory noise, fading rate relief; top system loss FAQs
Research evidence excerpt
J P M O R G A N
Asia Pacific Equity Research
06 August 2026
Philippine Power & Water Utilities
Regulatory noise, fading rate relief; top system loss
FAQs
The President's July 27 call to scrap the power system loss recovery casts a
regulatory overhang over Meralco while also lowering the odds of a timely tariff
reset. In this note, we summarize the key investor discussion points following our
downgrade of Meralco to Neutral last week. Investors agree the overhang could
linger, especially as political posturing rises. We see an ERC resolution amending
the current 5.5% technical system loss cap as the least disruptive path, averting an
EPIRA amendment, while the harsher options do little to bring rates down. Higher
generation charges drove 10% pts. of Meralco's 15% YTD increase in average
retail rates, and scrapping full system loss recovery saves consumers just 6%. For
Aboitiz Power, we see a smaller 5-7% theoretical NIAT hit from disallowed system
loss recovery given its lighter DU exposure (14% of ‘27E NIAT); we retain OW
on its high contracted capacity, favorable growth initiatives (RE, ESS) and PSEi
inclusion catalyst (Feb. 2027). We argue that water utilities are better insulated
from regulatory risk on lower rate hikes than power, near-free raw water and a
lighter share of household budgets; water service reliability through El Niño will
be imperative to avert heightened political scrutiny. We remain Neutral on MWC
on limited DPS growth post M&As and rising debt burden.
Power & Water
Price (05 Aug 26): Php43.00
FAQ #1: How could plans to scrap system loss recovery play out? The
government has set up a special task force to tackle system loss recovery
removal (link), with the Energy Secretary signaling rate relief for customers
within a year (link). Among the potential options to operationalize this, we see
an ERC resolution amending the current 5.5% technical system loss cap as the
least disruptive, as it averts an EPIRA amendment. Other options include: (1)
spreading the system loss burden across the power value chain, (2) folding
system loss into the distribution tariff as an embedded expense, or (3) limiting
…
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer