GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
Q2 Commodity Chemicals Preview
Research evidence excerpt
Q2 Commodity Chemicals Preview
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Arun Viswanathan, CFA
(Analyst)
(212) 301-1611,
arun.viswanathan@rbccm.com
Adam Hamilton (AVP)
(212) 266-4099,
adam.hamilton@rbccm.com
June 30, 2026 Brian Dong (Senior
Associate)
(929) 491-9665, Q2 Commodity Chemicals Preview brian.dong@rbccm.comRESEARCH Our view: Overall, while sector valuations have softened somewhat in recent weeks, we believe most
commodity chemicals names remain at or below mid-cycle valuation levels, although some chains
(esp. PU, Epoxy) could take longer to hit mid-cycle levels due to weak demand growth. Given the
ongoing closure at Hormuz, we think June contract pricing could settle flat for many chains, despite
lower June PE spot pricing. May PE settled flat despite +30cpp in April, although CMA is calling for
-25cpp in July. Additionally, we have not seen significant permanent asset closures on the back of
the conflict, although we think some cost curves could steepen as producers seek alternate reliable
feedstock sources, and the US cost advantage is driving margins for domestic producers, given a risingEQUITY oil/gas ratio. Broadly speaking, our estimates are generally in line with consensus. Going into the print,
we think CC is best positioned on 1) continued TSS growth from HFOs and 2-phase coolants, 2) our
expectations for an eventual refrigerants recovery, and 3) continued progress in PFAS settlements.
Names to Watch Going into Q2. Going into the print, our strongest preference is for CC, which we
think should continue to present strong HFO growth despite a delay in HFO step-downs given stronger
after-market margins in HFCs. We are adjusting Q2/FY26/FY27 estimates to $245M/$850M/$990M
from $235M/$850M/$950M (inline vs cons $237M/$844M/$987M), but slightly lower our PT to $26
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer