GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
GENERAL RETAIL : A guide to tariff guidance
Research evidence excerpt
GENERAL RETAIL : A guide to tariff guidance
EQUITIES
GENERAL RETAIL
FLASH NOTE
A guide to tariff guidance
10 JUNE 2026 Sector Research Report Production time: 21:16* (London time)
Research Analyst & Publishing Entities
Laurent Vasilescu BNP Paribas Securities Corp (1) (+1) 212 634 4971 Laurent.Vasilescu@us.bnpparibas.com
What happened?
With earnings largely wrapped up, we assess how the US brands accounted for tariffs in their guidance. Within our
coverage universe, brands have taken different approaches toward reporting results and guiding with respect to tariffs
and tariff refunds. We provide an overview of what each company is currently embedding in its outlook, considering
risks from: 1) higher duties when Section 122 tariffs expire in July, and 2) tariff refund uncertainty. In our view, names
with the least risk to estimates include AS (+), ONON (+), RL (+) and LEVI (+), while the names with downside include
UAA (=), VFC (-), and KTB (-) with the table provided below. We appreciate that VF Corp did parse out in the 10K that
roughly 30% of the IEEPA tariff charges will go back to the suppliers detailed in our recent note (see link). We hope
other companies will provide this level of disclosure.
BNPP View:
Across our coverage, companies have taken different approaches to reporting and guiding the impact of tariffs and tariff
refunds. We compare these differences across a handful of measures:
1) Have refunds been recognized in the P&L yet?
2) If so, were they adjusted from results, or included?
3) Are refunds included in FY guidance?
4) What tariff rate is currently included in guidance, given the upcoming expiration of Section 122 tariffs on
July 24th (see Figure 1 below)
There are a range of assumptions for tariff rates in 2H guidance…
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer