实时全球研报
美国生命科学工具与诊断:月度行业健康追踪(7月数据+2026年第二季度财报电话会议评论)
研报英文原文证据摘录
18 August 2026
US Life Science Tools & Diagnostics
US Life Science Tools & Diagnostics: Monthly sector health tracker
(July data + 2Q26 earnings calls commentary)
Eve Burstein
Louisa Qiu
We publish a monthly life science tools & diagnostics sector health tracker to aggregate 1)
qualitative commentary from major events, and 2) quantitative data that can help us assess
market trends and sentiments. Our last published issue is available here.
From a qualitative perspective, sentiment from 2Q26 earnings calls trended more
positive versus the June conferences. Most notable was increased biotech spending
in both the clinical AND preclinical environment; while increased spending in the clinical
environment was expected, our base case didn’t include preclinical spend this early in
the year. We also saw more examples of large step-ups in pharma spend in the preclinical
environment, vs. prior periods where these step-ups were almost exclusively in clinical trials
(see our new exhibit which captures this). Beyond pharma / biotech, there were signs of
improvement in the Academic & Government end market especially near the end of the
quarter, which has been the other biggest question mark for us in the near-term recovery
story. There were other small changes (both positive and negative) that we cover later in the
note, but they are far less material than the ones we mention here.
From a quantitative perspective, July sector health metrics are still generally
improving on a TTM basis; sequentially, several metrics stepped down but we see
this more as “reversion to the mean" after very tough comps from the preceding
month / year. The cleanest positives: Drug approvals (both originators and biosimilars)
all improved sequentially. Pharma R&D was also up 8% vs. 2Q25, 1p.p. higher than
the 7% average over the last ~15 years. The most misleading negatives: Clinical trial
starts, licensing deals, and biotech funding are all down sequentially… but they are all up
considerably (10%+) on a TTM basis, so we see this as reversion to the mean. Mixed, but
maybe the most important: NIH. In June we noted a major sequential step-up in funding and
…
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器