实时全球研报
Thinking Through Closed- vs. Open-Weights Model Adoption Impacts on Cybersecurity / Networking
研报英文原文证据摘录
Thinking Through Closed- vs. Open-Weights Model Adoption Impacts on Cybersecurity / Networking
Update
August 3, 2026 04:01 AM GMT
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLCMCybersecurity / Networking | North America Meta A Marshall
Equity Analyst
Thinking Through Closed- vs. Meta.Marshall@morganstanley.comAntonio Jaramillo +1 212 761-0430
Research Associate
Antonio.Jaramillo@morganstanley.com +1 212 761-4438
Open-Weights Model Adoption Ryan Lountzis
Ryan.Lountzis@morganstanley.com +1 212 761-3189
Impacts on Cyber / Networking Abhishek S Murli
Abhishek.S.Murli@morganstanley.com +1 212 761-7388
Along with our thematic teams note this morning discussing Lucas Cerisola
closed- vs open-weights model adoption scenarios, we lay out ResearchLucas.Cerisola@morganstanley.comAssociate +1 212 761-9194
how we see the scenarios unfolding in terms of cyber/
Software
networking beneficiaries. Enterprise cyber/networking vendors North America
benefit more in open-weights adoption, optical more in closed. Industry View Attractive
Key Takeaways
In general, more traffic / agents / data from AI adoption is a positive for the
networking / cyber ecosystem.
However, believe cloud heavy names more likely to benefit in closed-weights
world, enterprise names more likely to benefit in closed-weights world.
Please see our Global Thematics note today: Weighing In: Open-Weights Models & 3
States of the World.
All AI adoption is good, but believe beneficiaries change based on closed- vs.
open-weight models adopted. AI adoption by enterprises is overall a positive for
both cyber and networking. There are more traffic (networking / network security),
there are more agents (identity security), there are more data centers (more optical
/ networking). This is in addition to just hackers being more enabled with AI
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器