普通外文研报
EM Corporates: Hybrids primer: the premium for optionality
研报英文原文证据摘录
EM Corporates: Hybrids primer: the premium for optionality
debt Equity-like flexibility requires additional spread
Refinance an existing hybrid Maintains capital-structure and rating benefits Requires continued market access Replacement economics can anchor the call decision
Adds flexibility during a period of elevated Approaching loss of equity credit may support
Support balance-sheet repair Equity credit may be capped or time-limited
leverage replacement, but does not guarantee a call
Source: BofA Global Research
BofA GLOBAL RESEARCH
Debt legally, but partly equity for ratings
The treatment depends on the lens being applied. Legally, a corporate hybrid remains a
debt instrument that ranks behind senior creditors. Its accounting classification depends
on the applicable standards and contractual terms. For rating purposes, however, part of
the instrument may receive equity credit if it demonstrates sufficient permanence,
subordination and coupon-deferral capacity. Economically, the higher cost relative to
senior debt compensates investors for giving the issuer greater flexibility over the
timing of repayment and, where permitted by the documentation, coupon payments.
Legal maturity can differ from economic maturity
Corporate hybrids may be issued as perpetual securities with no contractual maturity or
as very long-dated notes, often with legal maturities of 30, 60 or more years. In either
case, investors may price the instrument to its first call date when the issuer has
credible economic and rating incentives to redeem or replace it then. The first call is an
issuer option, however, rather than a contractual maturity. Therefore, if refinancing
becomes uneconomic or call incentives weaken, expected maturity can extend abruptly
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器