普通外文研报
Looking Forward: PFG Focus Idea, How Should One Value an Insurtech
研报英文原文证据摘录
Looking Forward: PFG Focus Idea, How Should One Value an Insurtech
nd hybrid platforms, making a one-size- declines in equity valuations in their investment
fits-all valuation approach unreliable. We identify two common errors: applying the portfolios and higher claim costs related to
wrong framework for the underlying business model, and assuming a blanket Insurtech inflation and changes in the legal and regulatory
environment. premium. Instead, we believe there are several appropriate ways to value an Insurtech
stock, depending on the company’s business model, profitability stage, and risk profile.
See here for full report. Insurance Brokers: The insurance brokers
industry is subject to risks including interest rate
risk, P/C underwriting cycle and competition.
• Aflac (AFL, Overweight, $61.9 billion cap): We updated our earnings model to better
account for net investment income, as well as lower premium growth in Aflac Japan. Insurtech: The Insurtech industry is subject to
Our new model aligns more closely with management commentary around long-term risks including growth, profitability, underwriting,
expectations. See here for full report. AI adaption and cybersecurity.
• Goosehead (GSHD, Overweight, $1.7 billion cap): We are maintaining our Life: Interest rates; regulatory environment;
Overweight rating on GSHD following investor meetings with management. Our secular trends across fee & risk-based
meetings largely affirmed our investment thesis: We believe investors will look forward businesses; fee pressure; FX; distribution &
to the second half of 2026 when a combination of continued new business sales efforts access to customers; pricing dynamics &
and improving customer retention should allow GSHD to accelerate its revenue growth inflationary trends.
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器