普通外文研报
How Should One Value an Insurtech?
研报英文原文证据摘录
How Should One Value an Insurtech?
I N D U S T R Y N O T E
J u n e 2 2 , 2 0 2 6
InsurTech
CONCLUSION Paul Newsome, CFA, CPCU
Insurtechs span a wide range of business models, such as carriers, MGAs, brokers, and Managing Director, Piper Sandler & Co.
hybrid platforms, making a one-size-fits-all valuation approach unreliable. We identify two 312 281-3445, paul.newsome@psc.com
common errors: applying the wrong framework for the underlying business model, and Cam Bianchi
assuming a blanket Insurtech premium. Instead, we believe there are several appropriate Research Analyst, Piper Sandler & Co.
612 456-9841, cam.bianchi@psc.comways to value an Insurtech stock, depending on the company’s business model, profitability
stage, and risk profile.
Related Companies: Share Price:
AIZ 259.86
• Our Note Summary: SLDE 16.58
framework should follow the business model, not the Insurtech NP 29.24 ◦Valuation
label. Carriers, brokers, MGAs, and pre-profit platforms each have distinct earnings LMND 58.84
drivers, capital structures, and risk profiles that require different approaches. GSHD 36.88
Grouping companies solely by their level of technology enablement produces ARX 12.99
misleading comparisons. INDUSTRY RISKS
Insurtech insurance carriers, we believe P/E is the appropriate primary ◦For Insurtech: The Insurtech industry is subject to metric. P/E captures both underwriting operations and investment income – the
risks including growth, profitability, underwriting,
two core drivers of carrier economics. AI adaption and cybersecurity
broker- and MGA-like platforms, EBITDA-based metrics best reflect the ◦For
earnings model, in our view. Earnings are generated through commissions, fees,
and acquisition-driven scale rather than underwriting risk retention – similar to
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器