普通外文研报
European Transport and Infrastructure "Transport & Infra weekly. Key inv..."
研报英文原文证据摘录
European Transport and Infrastructure "Transport & Infra weekly. Key inv..."
ext of the
share price outperformance vs. peers since the start of the Middle East conflict, some
investors asked what could bring more upside from current levels? Aena trades on 10.8x
on our FY27 EV/EBITDA estimates vs. ~12x EV/EBITDA average pre Covid. We see scope
for the DGAC decision (September 2027) to provide a slightly higher outcome in terms
of WACC/tariffs for DORA III relative to CNMC. Looking in more depth at the CNMC
decision, we believe the change of the definition for the risk-free rate calculation vs.
DORA I and DORA II could be challenged, leading to increases in the risk-free rate
parameter. In Dora III CNMC is using an average of the last 5 years spot and forward
rates for the Spanish 10yr gov bond yield vs. the average of the last 6 months used in
DORA I and DORA II. Equally so, we see room for higher opex assumptions in the context
in which CNMC proposes a lower opex forecast underpinned by 0.84x elasticity that
may not fully account for opex related to the capex plan. Furthermore, in the context of
the 2027-2031 strategic plan likely to be presented after the DGAC decision, we see
scope for higher dividends medium term, where we stand 6-7% above consensus. We
expect Aena's focus to remain on offering an attractive cash return to shareholders.
Maersk: What is the Ocean division worth? We recently published a note on Maersk
having a closer look at what the Ocean division could be worth (link). Most incoming
questions were on our view that Maersk may have a market share problem with Ocean.
The analysis of deliveries and age profile of the fleet suggest that, based on the current
order book, Maersk could have ~12% market share in 2030 (18-19% pre-Covid). In our
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器