ReportGem ReportGem EN

普通外文研报

Activist Attractiveness Score (AAS)

发布日期: 2026-06-17研究机构: Wolfe Research报告页数: 7原文语言: 英语证据页码: 2

研报英文原文证据摘录

Activist Attractiveness Score (AAS)

JuneJune17,17,20262026

Activist Attractiveness Score: The UNLOCK Framework

In the exhibit below, we outline the 10 metrics used to derive our Activist Attractiveness Score (AAS). The AAS is

designed to quantify activist attractiveness across the fundamental drivers we believe are most relevant to activist

engagement, including shareholder Underperformance, Non-optimal capital allocation, Leadership and governance

gaps, Operational inefficiencies, Capital structure misalignment, and Katalyst Potential. Each metric is scored on a

sliding scale using predefined thresholds, enabling a systematic ranking of companies and a corresponding

percentile-based measure of activist attractiveness.

Activist Attractiveness Score (AAS) Metrics Methodology

10 Metric Activist Attractiveness Score Weighting Description

Measures the company’s near-term stock performance versus its sector, capturing recent value destruction or

LTM Sector Rel. Return

8% loss of investor confidence. Persistent short-term underperformance can signal execution issues or strategic

(↓ ratio = ↑ attractiveness)

issues attractive to activists.

Measures long-term shareholder underperformance versus sector peers and the SPXEKW, a common catalyst for

5 Yr. Sector/SPXEKW Rel. Return activist involvement. Multi-year underperformance strengthens the case that issues are structural rather than

25%

(↓ ratio = ↑ attractiveness) cyclical. Our research and conversations with activists found 5-Yr sector underperformance is the primary metric

for activist engagements. Note, We use the minimum of either the 5-Yr sector or SPXEKW underperformance.

Change in Ind. Rel. EV / EBITDA vs. 5 Yrs

Captures EV / EBITDA valuation multiple compression relative to peers over time. Meaningful de-rating often

本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。

打开研报阅读器