普通外文研报
EM & APAC Equity Strategy "How much to worry about rising US yields?" Tirumalai
研报英文原文证据摘录
EM & APAC Equity Strategy "How much to worry about rising US yields?" Tirumalai
for equities performance - we studied the
relationship between US yields and EM equities over a 20-year period. Our key learnings:
1) Nominal US yields themselves carry very little signal for equities - their components
(real yields + breakevens/inflation-expectations) are more useful. Unfortunately, no EM
has the kind of deep inflation-indexed bond market like the US - to study these for EM
local bonds. 2) The relationships have changed significantly over time. US breakevens
had the dominant signal for much of the last 20 years: positive relationship wherein EM
equities did well with rising inflation expectations - especially when such expectations
were driven by demand/growth drivers that helped EM corporate profits with EMs
having heavier commodity and cyclical tilt. But breakevens have largely become
irrelevant post-COVID with the composition of EM changing, and the nature of
inflationary impulse over the last few years being supply-driven rather than demand-led
(Figure 4HowhastheinfluenceofUSyieldsonEMequitieschangedovertime?Overa20-yearperiod,USbreakevenshavehadsignificantimpactonEMreturns,whilerealyieldshavehadlitleimpact.Butthatstorychangeswhenwesehowthesehavechangedovertimewithinthis20-yearperiod.Pre-COVIDperiodwaswhenbreakevenshadsignificantsignal,andtheyhavelargelybecomeirelevantpost-COVID.).
Real rates matter - but the relationship has changed over time
3) Real rates are actually more impactful now than break-evens - but that's
because their influence has not really faded away post COVID.4) Importantly -
about 10 years ago the direction of relationship between real rates and EM equities
flipped: they now firmly hurt when rising (vs helping earlier). That's probably to do with
本摘录由系统从所标注的 PDF 证据页直接提取并保留英文原文,不做批量翻译;登录后在阅读器切换中文时才按需翻译。
打开研报阅读器