ReportGem ReportGem 中文

REAL-TIME GLOBAL RESEARCH

Colgate-Palmolive Q2‘26 Earnings Review: In-line results, unchanged mid-to-long term forecasts.

Published: 2026-07-31Institution: BernsteinCompany / ticker: CLPages: 18Original language: EnglishEvidence page: 1

Research evidence excerpt

Colgate-Palmolive Q2‘26 Earnings Review: In-line results, unchanged mid-to-long term forecasts.

31 July 2026

Estimate Change

Cristian Rios

+1 917 344 8615

U.S. Beverages, Household & Personal Care Products cristian.rios@bernsteinsg.com

Colgate-Palmolive Co Yolanda Zhang

+1 917 344 8346

Rating yolanda.zhang@bernsteinsg.com

Market-Perform

Price Target

CL 99.00 USD (96.00 OLD)

Colgate-Palmolive Q2'26 Earnings Review: In-line results,

unchanged mid-to-long term forecasts.

CL reported a largely in-line F2Q26 result. Core EPS of $0.99 came in ahead of the $0.95

Close Date 31 Jul 2026

consensus. Organic Growth was in line at 2.4%, driven by volume up 0.8% (vs consensus

CL Close Price (USD) 91.30

0.7%) and price up 1.6% (vs consensus 1.8%). Top line YoY growth of 4.9% was modestly

Price Target (USD) 99.00

ahead of 4.7% consensus, and adj net income margin of 14.9% was ahead of14.2%

Upside/(Downside) 8%

consensus. The company largely maintained its FY26 guidance on Organic Sales Growth and

52-Week Range 99.33/74.55

Net Sales Growth, while adjusted Core EPS guidance to MSD from low-to-mid single digit

SPX 7,437.63

previously. The stock closed at $91.27, down -0.36% on the day.

FYE Dec

Growth was primarily driven by Emerging Markets, with Asia Pacific being the standout, Div Yield 2.3%

delivering organic growth 5.2% and outperforming consensus of 2.4%. North America Market Cap (USD) (M) 72,782

was the biggest disappointment, delivering -3.0% organic growth vs consensus of -1.1%. EV (USD) (M) 79,677

We believe that, like for P&G, a complex media landscape could be obstructing storytelling Performance YTD 1M 6M 12M

efforts, as advertising costs rise while market share declines in North America. We see future Absolute (%) 15.5 (0.4) 1.1 8.9

innovation as “business as usual” vs.

The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.

Open report viewer