ReportGem ReportGem 中文

REAL-TIME GLOBAL RESEARCH

Sands China (1928.HK): Management Expects to Achieve Operating Leverage with Opex to Level Off in 2H26E

Published: 2026-07-23Institution: CitiCompany / ticker: 1928.HKPages: 16Original language: EnglishEvidence page: 1

Research evidence excerpt

Sands China (1928.HK): Management Expects to Achieve Operating Leverage with Opex to Level Off in 2H26E

Action |

22 Jul 2026 20:47:54 ET │ 16 pages

Sands China (1928.HK)

Management Expects to Achieve Operating Leverage with Opex to

Level Off in 2H26E

CITI'S TAKE

Management attributes the disappointing headline 2Q26 EBITDA of Buy

US$430m (-24% YoY) to the exceptionally low VIP hold and the Global

Soccer Tournament, but stressed that 2Q26 results do not represent the Catalyst Watch: Downside, expires 09-AUG-26

Sands China’s true earnings power. We are encouraged by management’s Price (22 Jul 26 16:10) HK$13.20

continued focus on gaining EBITDA market share. Its strong event and Target price HK$18.50↓concert lineup in 2H26 should help drive business recovery. Management

also expects its opex to level off in 2H26E, which should stabilize its EBITDA from HK$19.00

margin. Management intends to have all 2,900 rooms and suites at the Expected share price

Venetian completely refurbished and reintroduced by CNY-28E, and it 40.2% returnexpects little disruption throughout its property portfolio during the

process. We maintain our Buy rating (but trim our TP from HK$19 to Expected dividend yield 7.6%

HK$18.50) as Sands China is usually the largest beneficiary from the strong Expected total return 47.7%

visitation during the summer holidays. The stock has a 7.6% dividend yield, Market Cap HK$106,833Moffering investors meaningful downside risk protection.

US$13,625M

2Q26 Results Miss — Net revenue was largely flat YoY at US$1,790m (or -15% QoQ).

Property EBITDA fell 24% YoY to US$430m (or -32% QoQ), ~15% lower than our

forecast and BBG consensus (US$505m). Luck-adjusted property EBITDA would

have been US$517m. Luck-adjusted EBITDA margin declined ~4.6 ppts YoY to Price Performance

The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.

Open report viewer