REAL-TIME GLOBAL RESEARCH
BHP Group: Another Capex Reset at Jansen
Research evidence excerpt
BHP Group: Another Capex Reset at Jansen
RGET | % TO PT $96.00 | +6%
1 spend, cumulative committed investment in Jansen now stands at roughly US$19.8bn vs. ~US
$15.1bn implied at the time of Stage 2 sanction. Drivers cited remain consistent: inflation, design/
scope changes, lower productivity, and - for both the Jan-26 S1 and today's S2 reset - additional FY (Jun) CHANGE TO JEFe JEF vs CONS
construction hours and material quantities. 2026 2027 2026 2027
REV NA NA NA NA
Returns Still Defended by BHP, but the Margin of Safety is Thin: Stage 2 economics screen EPS NA NA +1% +17%
as follows on BHP's updated assumptions: IRR of 11% and an 8-year payback at consensus
prices averaging US$330/t for FY31–41, with underlying EBITDA margins >65%. Real unit cash 2026 ($) 1HalfA 2Half FY
cost guidance is unchanged at US$114-130/t for the combined operation. Production targets are EPS 1.22 1.38 2.61
also unchanged: 4.36 Mtpa from Stage 2, taking combined Jansen output to 8.5 Mtpa (~10% of PREV
global potash supply) after a two-year ramp. For comparison, Stage 1 economics deteriorated more
materially in the Jan-26 update – IRR of 7.9–9.1% and payback of 11–15 years at consensus,
with margins of 63–64% – so, on paper, Stage 2 still screens as the better-return phase, helped by
infrastructure leverage.
Our Call: We expected a capex increase as BHP had stated Stage 2 capex estimates were under
review. However, this increase was somewhat more than we had anticipated. Our NPV/share for
the company falls 1.1% as a result of this new capex guide. BHP trades on a FY27 EV/EBITDA of
6.4x and FCF yield of 4.5% on our updated estimates. We see better value elsewhere in mining at
this time and reiterate our Hold rating on BHP.
Christopher LaFemina, CFA * | Equity Analyst
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer