GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
Sandvik (1K) | Hold (vs Buy) | Strong Q2 likely, but limited upside
Research evidence excerpt
Sandvik (1K) | Hold (vs Buy) | Strong Q2 likely, but limited upside
r term, but normalisation lies ahead
In line with Q1, we expect tungsten scarcity to remain a key driver of Machining in Q2,
supporting pre-buying, price effects and continued strength in Powder Solutions. This should
inflate orders, revenues and margins near term, but we would be cautious on extrapolating the
full benefit. The key question into Q2 is therefore how much of Machining’s strength reflects real
underlying recovery, and how much is driven by tungsten, pre-buying, pricing and price-cost
timing.
The most mechanical margin benefit is in powder. Historically, powder has been margin dilutive
to Machining, but the current pricing environment changes the near-term equation. Powder
selling prices typically follow APT prices with around a one-month lag, while higher raw-
material costs are recognized in COGS with around a three-month lag. In a rising tungsten
market, this creates a temporary positive price-cost spread, making powder accretive rather
than dilutive. Sandvik also benefits from its own tungsten supply through Wolfram and Buffalo
Tungsten, which is a clear competitive advantage in an environment where Chinese export
restrictions have tightened availability.
Cutting tools should also benefit, but with a longer lag. Higher tungsten costs first pass through
powder and then through cutting-tool inventories, adding roughly another six months before
the full cost impact is reflected in COGS. This can create temporary margin support as price
increases and surcharges are implemented before the higher-cost inventory fully rolls through.
However, as 2026 progresses, more of the higher tungsten cost should start to come through the
cutting-tools P&L.
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer