GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
Better risk-reward – back to BUY
Research evidence excerpt
Better risk-reward – back to BUY
Yara
Q2'26 expectations
Yara publishes detailed material ahead of its quarterly reports to support analysts' modelling.
Yara's actual results have on average been USD 68m (USD 37m in Q1'26) better than
indicated in the pre-quarter material.
The Q2'26 material indicated EBITDA of USD 1,277m using a volume-neutral outside-in
model. In addition to the price impact, analysts should assess the impact of a potential weak
or strong price realisation, third-party distribution margins, phosphate upgrading margins or
other mix effects, deliveries and the impact of the ongoing cost reduction programme.
Volumes: Yara warned of weaker volumes in the pre-quarter material. A planned
maintenance stop at Belle Plaine and an unplanned outage at Pilbara (Australia) and
Ferrara (Italy) will likely have a negative impact of USD 100-150m, according to the material.
In addition, the price volatility and higher prices reduced demand in markets in the off-
season (e.g. Latin America, where Yara has large presences). Finally, the European
industry saw pre-buying early in the season to adjust to any price implication from the
implementation of CBAM. Volumes surprised positively in Q1, suggesting that Q2 could
potentially disappoint given the high prices.
We put the expected headwind from volumes in the high end of the aforementioned interval
at USD 150m for Q2'26.
Underlying volumes have improved since the trough in Q1'23. Core deliveries in the last 12
months were 19.28mt, which compares to 16.35mt at the trough in Q1'23. Yara has regained
some of the lost volumes from the pre-Ukraine war period. However, we still think Yara is
earning less than it should when these volumes are regained. (see discussion below)
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer