GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
IVZ: Thoughts about IVZ share weakness
Research evidence excerpt
IVZ: Thoughts about IVZ share weakness
EQUITY RESEARCH QUICK TAKE
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Kenneth S. Lee (Analyst)
Adam Fallis (Associate)
June 24, 2026
Invesco Ltd.
Thoughts about IVZ share weakness
NYSE: IVZ | USD 27.02 | Outperform | Price Target USD 31.00
Sentiment: Neutral
Net/net: We attribute weakness in IVZ shares on Tuesday (6.1% decline vs 1.4% decline in the S&P 500 index) partly to State Street
(STT, covered by RBC analyst Gerard Cassidy) filing a prospectus for its new Nasdaq-100 index ETF; interestingly, filings indicate the
management fee rate on the product would be 10bps, which would be materially lower than the roughly 18bps fee rate for IVZ's
QQQ product. As a reminder, the Nasdaq licensing fee alone would likely be 8bps for all providers. Recall, in early April, BlackRock
(BLK, not covered) and State Street separately filed to launch index ETFs based on the Nasdaq-100 index as Nasdaq expanded the
licensing of the index; IVZ's QQQ previously had the exclusive license.
While a lower-fee Nasdaq-100 index ETF product could alter competitive dynamics for money in motion for IVZ's QQQ product,
which had nearly $500bn AUM as of May 31, we still believe the QQQ's installed base would be tough to erode given potential
taxes on unrealized gains that could make switching costs high. Further, the QQQ's advantages include liquidity, tight spreads/
low tracking error, deep options markets, broad retail/institutional investor base, and brand recognition. We would also point out
that IVZ itself had introduced a lower-fee QQQM product in the past that did not cannibalize QQQ product growth. Our recent
monthly analysis of net flows using Simfund data had indicated that IVZ's QQQ product likely had positive net flows for the months
of April and May.
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer