GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
Insurance (360) | Built for profitability
Research evidence excerpt
Insurance (360) | Built for profitability
relatively low capital consumption. For Storebrand, diversification
benefits further reduce the capital intensity of non-life growth, supporting
attractive returns despite a higher combined ratio than pure P&C peers.
▪ Autonomous vehicles are more likely to be a gradual long-term risk than a near-
term disruption. We estimate that the direct exposure to collision-related motor
premiums is significantly smaller than commonly perceived, while rising repair
complexity, software risks, and mobility services could create new insurance
opportunities.
▪ Shareholder returns remain attractive and highly visible. Nordic insurers offer an
average 2027E total shareholder yield of 6.1%, supported by ordinary dividends,
buybacks, and selected excess capital distributions.
Valuation model
▪ We value the Nordic insurers using a sum-of-the-parts implied P/E framework
based on our 2027E earnings estimates. We apply our in-house risk-free rate and
equity risk premium, with different costs of equity by business line depending on
capital intensity, earnings stability, and balance-sheet strength.
▪ The Nordic sector trades at an average 14.9x 2027E P/E, above the broader KECH
insurance coverage average of 11.3x. We believe this premium is justified by
stronger underwriting profitability, lower earnings volatility, and higher capital
visibility, but leaves less room for disappointment among the more mature P&C
names.
▪ Our stock preference reflects where we still see incremental upside. We prefer
Sampo and Storebrand, where capital returns, strategic optionality, and capital-
light growth remain visible, while we are more cautious on Gjensidige and Tryg
given the already strong profitability levels and more limited rerating potential.
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer