GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
South Africa Economics: Where We Stand
Research evidence excerpt
South Africa Economics: Where We Stand
Idea
June 10, 2026 04:00 AM GMT
RMB Morgan Stanley Proprietary LimitedMSouth Africa Economics | EEMEA Andrea Masia
Economist
Where We Stand Andrea.Masia@rmbmorganstanley.com +27 11 587-0820
Exhibit 1 : Uncertainty around the global
Following still elevated oil prices, monetary policy tightening growth outlook; for now downside risks appear
from the SARB and growing expectations that other G4 central contained
banks will follow, we provide a short overview of where we 6.0 Real GDP Growth Across Alternative Scenarios
5.0
stand from a South Africa macro perspective. 4.0
South Africa enters the second half of 2026 with a tougher macro mix: growth is 3.0
2.0
softer, inflation is higher and the SARB has turned more hawkish. It is important to 1.0
emphasise that the reform agenda and compression in risk-premium remains intact, 0.0
even as the near-term operating environment is more difficult, more uneven and -1.0
2026E 2027E 2026E 2027E 2026E 2027E 2026E 2027E 2026E 2027E 2026E 2027E
more margin-sensitive than it was three months ago: Global CEEMEA South Africa US Euro Area China
Baseline US Aggregate Demand Shock US AI Productivity Boost
• We forecast real GDP growth of 1.2%Y in 2026 and 1.6%Y in 2027, with Global Oil-Led Recession Permanent Oil Premium Regime
higher energy prices, tighter monetary policy and weaker household Source: National Statistical Agencies, Haver, Morgan Stanley Research
spending weighing on activity. Recent flooding adds marginal near-term Note:AggregateGlobalexcludesAggregateTurkeyexcludesand Egypt.Turkey, Egypt and Argentina. CEEMEA
downside risk. Fortunately, fuel supply stress appears contained and Q1 data
surprised to the upside.
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer