GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
Diageo PLC: Last Call for Premiumisation
Research evidence excerpt
Diageo PLC: Last Call for Premiumisation
IdeaM
Summary assumptions and conclusions
The following sections run through the price repositioning strategy that we believe Diageo
will take, across different segments and markets. Before summarising our conclusions,
however, we make the following basic assumptions:
1) We have examined the price points of the various brands within each category in order
to understand where Diageo brands sit. Our price labelling is not to be taken as
comparable to industry terms such as Ultra-premium, Prestige, Value etc, as used by
IWSR, or with the DISCUS classification of Value, Premium, High-End Premium etc: the
point is simply to divide the market into clear segments of pricing, which obviously varies
by Spirit type.
2) We do not see this strategy as expanding the market in volume terms, but in permitting
Diageo to capture more volume share. As noted above, there are plenty of cheaper priced
options in tequila/scotch/vodka/gin etc, and we do not see Diageo as offering a
fundamentally new price point for alcohol. When considering volume share gains in
response to lower pricing, we consider the share gains in the context of the new pricing
tier into which the product moves.
3) Our pricing assumptions assume that Diageo achieves better OSG than it might
otherwise have done had these price adjustments not been made. We do not
automatically assume that Diageo can achieve positive OSG, however: the ultimate result
needs to be considered against the backdrop of a market where demand is fundamentally
weak and Diageo, and its peers, have negative OSG currently.
4) We note that Diageo also intends to push more aggressively into the RTD market; CFO
Nik Jhangiani has been flagging this strategy for some time, and we believe that it is
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer