GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
Wolfe Capital Markets Data Pack - Edition XXII
Research evidence excerpt
Wolfe Capital Markets Data Pack - Edition XXII
Brokers, Asset Managers & Exchanges
Wolfe Capital Markets Data Pack - Edition XXII May 24, 2026
2Q IB / Trading: Size Matters as Universals are Better
Positioned vs. Smid / M&A Brokers
What is in this edition of our Capital Markets Data Pack: There is no shortage of
topics to unpack, with the combination of AI fears, higher volatility, and geopolitical
uncertainty spurring debate on the Capital Markets outlook. We also had the Steven Chubak, CFA schubak@wolferesearch.com
opportunity to engage with mgmt. teams at our Capital Markets Day on topics (646) 582-9315
including: 1) The outlook on Sponsor activity; 2) Expectations for restructuring activity; View Steven’s Research
View Comp Tableand 3) Secondaries / PCA growth given a more favorable Sponsor backdrop.
2Q IB / Trading Setup: Bulge Bracket banks best positioned for 2Q. QTD IB Brendanbobrien@wolferesearch.comO'Brien
activity is tracking -5% below cons. with softer M&A completions largely offset by 646-582-9316
more robust ECM activity. Meanwhile, trading indicators suggest a more favorable Sharon Leung
backdrop, with our analysis implying +2% upside to cons. There is a clear divide in 2Q sleung@wolferesearch.com(646) 582-9317
trends between large and small firms, with greater upside to cons. at the Universal /
Bulge Bracket banks and downside risk limited to the Smids / M&A Independents. Derekdgonda@wolferesearch.comGonda
Positive outliers (vs. cons): MC (+18%), GS (+13%), BAC (+6%), JPM (+6%), Citi (+6%),
and MS (+5%). Negative outliers (vs. cons.): PWP (-53%), RJF (-28%), PJT (-23%),
PIPR (-12%), and HLI (-10%).
What is our expectation for Sponsor activity? There has been negativity on the
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer