GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
North America Power & Utilities "PJM's Rulemaking Combination Looks Cons..."
Research evidence excerpt
North America Power & Utilities "PJM's Rulemaking Combination Looks Cons..."
Valuation Method and Risk Statement
North America Utilities: Our valuation methodology for the group is price-to-earnings
based.The adjustments applied fall into 7 categories. These are as follows: 1) Group Valuation
Bias:Flowing from our valuation work comparing Baa corporate yields to group dividend
yields and RU price-to-earnings ratios to those for the S&P 500, we incorporate a positive or
negative adjustment to our group multiple representing the gap we calculate to the nearest
5%; 2) Growth Adjustment: We adjust our valuations based on the growth quartile each
utility occupies. First quartile receives a 4% premium, second quartile a 2% premium, third
quartile a 2% discount and fourth quartile a 4% discount; 3) Regulatory Adjustment: Our
valuation ajustments for regulation are based on our proprietary Regulatory Rankings. First
quartile jurisdictions receive 6%, second quartile 2%, third quartile -2% and fourth quartile
-6%; 4) Clean Energy Transition: A potential 5% premium for a risk-adjusted clean energy
transition growth opportunity; 5) Earnings Consistency Adjustment: We assign premiums/
discounts to reflect our views on track records, management execution and risks to the
business plans; 6) Multi Utility Diversified Valuation: For multi utilities (those with more than
15% of unregulated earnings), we perform a sum-of-the-parts analysis applying business/
region appropriate valuations to those diversified businesses; 7) One-off Adjustments: In
special situations, we value risk on an issue-specific basis. Common areas where we apply
such an adjustment include: large project construction risk, legal risk, and announced M&A
completion risk.
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer