GLOBAL RESEARCH ARCHIVE
US Mid-cap Banks: “Sweep” dreams
Research evidence excerpt
US Mid-cap Banks: “Sweep” dreams
Accessible version
US Mid-cap Banks
“Sweep” dreams
Industry Overview
Where we stand on cash sorting debate 18 May 2026
We see deposit sorting (frictionless movement of excess liquidity to higher yielding Equity
alternatives) as a real threat to industry NIMs, all else equal, via stickier/rising deposit United States
costs. That said, the risk has a long tail: it will be the younger demographic that is more Banks
likely to adopt AI to maximize returns on excess liquidity. (Our research shows the “Great Brandon Berman
Wealth Transfer” expected to span the next two decades). Structural differences (i.e., Research Analyst
accessibility, technology) suggest bank disintermediation and funding stability risk from BofAS+1 646 855 3933
cash sorting are greater today vs. when money market funds (MMFs) were introduced in brandon.berman@bofa.com
late-1900s. However, the latter concerns are overstated and overlook proven adaptability Ebrahim H. Poonawala
Research Analyst
by the industry, specifically the potential AI-related productivity/ efficiency gains. BofAS
+1 646 743 0490
Composition today, strategy tomorrow ebrahim.poonawala@bofa.com
Banks with lower L/D ratios and a higher percentage of NIB deposits should be better
positioned to combat cash sorting, though such competition is likely unavoidable. We Acronyms:
expand our screen to include available deposit market share (proxy for competitiveness), CDs: certificates of deposit
CTD beta, and % uninsured. Lower risk: FHB, BOH, CBC. Higher risk: FLG, ASB, FHN.
CTD: cycle to dateWe believe deposit acquisition strategies will come into focus, especially those that are
L/D: loan/deposit ratiomarried to banking services. We also expect banks to find ways to optimize funding
The English excerpt is extracted automatically from the cited source page and may contain layout or recognition errors. It is never batch translated.
Open report viewer