ReportGem ReportGem

Academic paper

The X-ray-Weak Tail of the Quasar Population: Physical Properties and Redshift Evolution of Variability-Selected AGN in eFEDS

Authors: P. Ar\'evalo (1 and 2), J. Buchner (3), M. Salvato (3), P. S\'anchez-S\'aez (4), F. Bauer (5), M.L. Mart\'inez-Aldama (6 and 2), D. Tub\'in-Arenas (7), J. Cer\'on-Meneses (1 and 2), R. Pucha (8), P. Lira (9 and 2), A. Merloni (3), M. Mezcua (10 and 11), M. Krumpe (7) ((1) U. Valpara\'iso, Chile, (2) TITANS, (3) MPE, Germany (4) ESO-Garching, (5) U. Tarapac\'a, Chile, (6) U. Concepci\'on, Chile, (7) AIP, Germany, (8) University of Utah, USA, (9) U. de Chile, (10) ICE, CSIC, Barcelona, Spain, (11) IEEC, Barcelona, Spain)Published: 2026-07-30Paper ID: 2607.27675Category: astro-ph.GALicense: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract

(abridged) Aims: To characterize variability-selected AGN candidates within the eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS), leveraging the synergy between optical variability and deep X-ray observations by SRG (Spectrum Roentgen Gamma)/eROSITA, to compare the physical properties of AGN populations selected through complementary methods. Methods: We used a sample of AGN candidates selected via optical variability by Ar\'evalo et al. and cross-match it to the X-ray selected eFEDS AGN sample. Spectroscopic characterizations are obtained for the matched samples from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument public data products. Results: We find a high classification purity with 98% candidates confirmed as broad-line AGN/QSOs. We identify a significant population (25%) that lack X-ray counterparts (X-U) in the eFEDS survey. We find that the X-D and X-U samples exhibit distinct physical properties and redshift distributions. The X-U sample peaks at $z = 2$ while the X-D sample at $z =1$, with nearly half of the variability-selected AGN at $z > 2.5$ remaining undetected in X-rays. This missing fraction can be attributed to K-correction effects and SED evolution with luminosity, mainly resulting in high accretion rate objects falling out of the X-D sample at higher redshifts. X-ray variability accounts for a part of the missing fraction but its dependence with redshift is less clear. Ensemble spectral analysis reveals that X-D sources have steeper optical continua and stronger broad emission lines than their X-U counterparts, while the forbidden and semi-forbidden lines have equal EWs in both samples. Finally, broad absorption line (BAL) features are found almost exclusively in the X-U population. This "missing" X-ray population must be accounted for when extrapolating X-ray-selected AGN to the broader Type I population and could impact cosmic estimates of massive black hole growth.

This public page contains bibliographic metadata and the author abstract. Use the reader for licensed document access.

Open licensed paper reader